![]() I also attempted snap and flatpak (which gave me yay compiling experience). ![]() I also have some questions about yay, because it seemed to lack some features of 'make'. Being a gigabyte of code, even my 80% current machine would have taken a good long time (using yay). So given my disgust, I went and found ungoogled-chromium and attempted to compile it. This is illegal under anti-trust laws (I think), but not that democratic protection laws matter in these days of 'redneck insurrection'. If something truly free and beneficial comes along (with me hoping duckduckgo is just that), google pulls for its direct competitors in opposition to competition from better, but smaller, efforts. Point being, google is supporting greed as a dominant capital concept - even at its own expense. I could access it, but not quickly, which is what the browser business has been all about since netscape vs explorer. And I could remove those two, but not add duckduckgo. Now, I would put this to typical capital greed, except that you could choose between the two other giants, bing and yahoo. I was unaware of this (until just now), but my hairs stood up yesterday when I learned that I cannot make duckduckgo my default engine in chromium. Culturally or politically speaking, this is ours and google stole it leveraging our ideas of 'free'. Ungoogled-chromium: it seems obvious to me that Arch needs to cut the google cord by supporting ungoogled-chrome by creating a direct install from pacman.Ī quick look at the history of blink (if not google itself) is it's lineage (kind words) is in "the KHTML and KJS libraries from KDE" (wikipedia).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |